MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104464183 · doi:10.19204/2025/cltv1

Cultivating ethnocultural empathy in healthcare: The effects of multilingualism and cross-cultural experiences

2025· article· en· W7104464183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyScale (ratio)Health careConstruct (python library)Health professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Empathy is a multidimensional construct essential to effective healthcare delivery, encompassing general, clinical, and ethnocultural components. While the importance of empathy in clinical settings is well-established, limited research has examined how these distinct dimensions interrelate and what sociodemographic factors may influence them. This study aimed to investigate the relationships among general, clinical, and ethnocultural empathy in healthcare professionals in Greece, and to identify sociodemographic predictors of higher empathy levels. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the first quarter of 2022, involving a convenience sample of 106 healthcare professionals (medical and nursing staff) from public hospitals across Greece. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire distributed via professional Facebook groups. The instrument included the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ), the Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Health Professional Version (JSE-HP), the Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy (SEE), and a sociodemographic survey. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0, employing descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, and stepwise linear regression. Results: Significant positive correlations were observed among general, clinical, and ethnocultural empathy scores. Higher levels of education, foreign language proficiency, and prior intercultural experiences (such as studying or living abroad) emerged as significant predictors of increased empathy across all three domains. Discussion: The findings support the interconnected nature of empathy types and suggest that intercultural exposure may enhance empathic capacity, echoing Allport’s contact hypothesis. These insights have implications for healthcare education, highlighting the need to integrate ethnocultural empathy training to foster inclusivity and improve patient-centered care in increasingly diverse clinical environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.618
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207