MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Technologies and Educational Resources of the Future: Generative AI and Learning Analytics in the Classroom and Beyond

2025· article· ru· W7104565132 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagogičeskij dialog. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Education
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyticsGenerative grammarLearning analyticsKey (lock)Cultural analyticsGenerative modelBig data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning analytics has become an increasingly prominent aspect of 21st century educational research and practice. In this article, I will discuss some of the key applications of learning analytics, as well as emerging opportunities to use learning analytics to understand and support learning, engagement, and long-term life success. I will also discuss how recent developments in generative artificial intelligence are impacting learning analytics methods and uses. At the same time, I will discuss the new challenges brought by the growing use of generative AI and the new opportunities to influence both research and practice. Учебная аналитика становится всё более важным аспектом образовательных исследований и практики XXI века. В данной статье рассматриваются ключевые области применения учебной аналитики, а также новые возможности её использования для понимания и поддержки процессов обучения, вовлечённости учащихся и их долгосрочного жизненного успеха. Особое внимание уделяется тому, как последние достижения в области генеративного искусственного интеллекта влияют на методы и применение аналитики обучения. Наряду с этим анализируются вызовы, возникающие в связи с распространением генеративного ИИ, и обсуждаются перспективы, открывающиеся как для научных исследований, так и для практики в образовании. Оқытудағы аналитика – XXI ғасырда білім берудегі зерттеулер мен тәжірибенің аса маңызды аспектілерінің бірі болып табылады. Мақалада оқудағы аналитика қолданылатын негізгі салалар, оқыту процесін, оқушылардың белсенді қатысуын, олардың өмірде табысты болуын қолдауға бағытталған жаңа мүмкіндіктер қарастырылады. Сонымен қатар генеративті жасанды интеллект саласындағы соңғы жетістіктердің оқытудағы аналитика әдістеріне және оның қолданылуына қалай әсер ететініне тоқталамыз. Генеративті ЖИ-дің кеңінен таралуы білім беру саласына жаңа мүмкіндіктермен қатар бірқатар сын-талаптарды да алып келуде. Мақалада осы жаңа сын-талаптар және оларды еңсеру жолдары, сондай-ақ зерттеу және білім беру тәжірибесін жетілдірудегі әлеуеті талқыланады.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.021
Scholarly communication0.0180.023
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePedagogičeskij dialog.Same topicArtificial Intelligence in EducationFrench-language works237,207