Acicnemis luteomaculata Morimoto & Miyakawa 1995
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acicnemis luteomaculata Morimoto & Miyakawa, 1995 Figs 1, 2E, 6 H 1–6, 2, 19 Type material examined (Japan: 45). Holotype. Japan: Fukuoka Prefecture: • Hiko-san, 13–14. VI. 1957, K. Morimoto, bears red label reading “ (HOLOTYPE) Acicnemis luteomaculata Morimoto et. Miyakawa, 1994 ”, ELKU, ELKU 2961. Paratypes. Japan: Ehime Prefecture: • Hojo-shi, Mt. Takanawa, 18. V. 2003, T. Kurihara (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_420; Fukuoka Prefecture: • Hiko-san, 8. VI. – 13. VII. 1957, K. Morimoto (11, KUM), JHL_AREV_181 – JHL_AREV_190, JHL_ACITAI_090 (dissected male); • same locality, 4. VI. 1958, K. Morimoto (2, KUM), JHL_AREV_192, JHL_AREV_193; • same locality, 10. VII. 1938, Hori, Kawahara & Yasumatsu (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_194; • Mt. Wakasugi, 18. XII. 1955, K. Oshima (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_120; • Wakasugi, 28. VII. 1940, T. Shirozu (2, KUM), JHL_AREV_405, JHL_AREV_406; Fukushima Prefecture: • Mt. Shizukura-yama, Mishima Town, 37.3756°N, 139.6266°E, 11–20. VII. 2018, K. Narita (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_412; Kochi Prefecture: • Mt. Tebako, 7–10. VIII. 1957, K. Morimoto (2, KUM), JHL_AREV_196, JHL_AREV_197; Nara Prefecture: • Mt. Odaigahara, 2. VII. 1978, H. Hiramatsu (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_198; • Kasugayama, 25. VII. 1959, T. Hozumi (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_121; • Kasuga, 5–31. V. 1959, K. Ueda (3, KUM), JHL_AREV_401 – JHL_AREV_403; • Kasuga, 30. IV. 1961, K. Ueda (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_404; Okayama Prefecture: • Takahashi City, Mt. Gagyuzan, 19–20. V. 1975, H. Irie (3, KUM), JHL_AREV_178 – JHL_AREV_180; Wakayama Prefecture: • Mt. Gomadan, 28. VII. 1979, I. Matoba (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_191. Non-type material. Japan: Ehime Prefecture: • Hojo-shi, Mt. Takanawa, 18. V. 2003, T. Kurihara (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_420; • Ishizuchi Mt., Omogo Valley, 18–25. VIII. 1980, S. & J. Peck (1, CMNC), JHL_AREV_668; Fukuoka Prefecture: • Hiko-san, 23–26. VII. 1968, M. Chujo (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_195; Hiroshima Prefecture: • Sandankyo, 12–13. V. 1969, M. Chujo (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_418; Miyazaki Prefecture: • Miyakonojo-shi, Natsuo-cho, Miike, 22. VI. 2019, R. Ito (6, KUM), JHL_AREV_407 – JHL_AREV_411, JHL_DNA_117 (GenBank accession number: PV 255632); Nara Prefecture: • Kasuga, 10. V. 1959, T. Shibata (1, KUM), JHL_ACITAI_091; Oita Prefecture: • Mt. Kuro-dake, 28. V. 1990, S. Ogata (4, KUM), JHL_AREV_413 – JHL_AREV_416; • Tsukahara, Yufuin-cho, Yufu-shi, 21. XI. 2016, R. Ito (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_721; • Tsukahara, Yufuin-cho, Yufu-shi, 27. V. 2018, R. Ito (1, KUM), JHL_DNA_123 (GenBank accession number: PV 255633); Wakayama Prefecture: • Komoridani, 21. VIII. 1941, K. Sakaguchi (1, HUM), JHL_AREV_678; Yamagata Prefecture: • Tozawa-mura, Mt. Haguro, 23. VI. 2003, J. Aoki (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_417. Diagnosis. Body length 4.0– 5.4 mm. Covered in pale brown scales, with two obliquely shaped tan-colored, black-bordered spots across middle of elytra. Pronotum lacking impunctate longitudinal midline (present in A. koguma). Scutellum sparsely covered in pale yellow scales. All elytral intervals with erect scales. Sclerolepidia indistinct, forming low, rounded, non-protruding tubercles. Third tarsomeres distinctly truncate (Fig. 2 E) (compare with the superficially similar A. kiotoensis, A. maculaalba, and A. sauteri, which all have emarginate third tarsomeres). Pedon with lateral edges approx. parallel in dorsal view, but converging evenly into a blunt, rounded point. Internal sac not visible inside the aedeagus, but with a basal projection that bears a distinctive rectangular sclerite anteriorly at its apex (Fig. 6 H 1 – 2). Distribution. This species is found in mainland Japan (except Hokkaido) and has also been reported from South Korea (Park et al. 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".