Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acicnemis biarcuata Hubenthal, 1919 Fig. 8 Type material examined (Taiwan: 5). Holotype. Taiwan • “ Kosempo ”, “ Formosa ”, “ IX. 09 ”, “ Sauter ”, bears red label reading “ Holotypus ”, SDEI, SDEI Coleoptera # 303414, SDEI Muncheburg COL–18569. Non-type material. Taiwan • Lienhoachii, “ 1975.5. 12 ”, S. Imasaka (1, TUA), JHL_SYN_184; • Mudan Township, Pingtung County, 22°08'21.71"N, 120°51'31.23"E, 9. III. 2013, Y. Fujisawa (1, TUA), JHL_AREV_626; • Mudan Township, Pingtung County, 22°06'12.57"N, 120°47'33.71"E, 6. III. 2013, Y. Fujisawa (1, TUA), JHL_AREV_627; • Manzhou Township, Pingtung County, 22°08'30"N, 120°51'13"E, 2. V. 2019, S. Shimamoto (1, TUA), JHL_AREV_628. Diagnosis. Body length 4.0– 5.2 mm. Covered in dark-gray scales, with two V-shaped, transverse black bands across middle of elytra. Pronotum with pale brown and yellow scales dorsally, but dark at base medially. Pronotum approx. sculptured and carinate. Scutellum shiny and bare in examined specimens. Only odd elytral intervals with erect scales across elytral disk (some erect scales on 2 nd interval in apical fourth of elytra). Third and fifth elytral intervals with cluster of 3–5 erect scales at elytral base. Sclerolepidia distinct and protruding. Mesosternum with distinctly raised ridge between meso-coxae, highest laterally but dipping shallowly medially (no such ridge or only weakly developed in most other species). Third tarsomeres weakly emarginate. Distribution. This species is currently only known from Taiwan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".