"Pour le bien des enfants?" ("For the Good of the Children?"): Critical News Media Analysis of Deficit Discourses in the Expansion of Quebec's Kindergarten Program in 1960-1962 and 2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research project explored historic and current interventionist and deficit-based discourses in news media related to the universalization of kindergarten education in Quebec. Public debates surrounding the universalization of kindergarten for 5-year-olds in the early 1960s, during the Quiet Revolution, a period of rapid modernization and change, were compared to public debates during the 2018 provincial election where the universalization of kindergarten for 4-year-olds was proposed. A series of 196 news articles were analyzed via a critical, intersectional feminist poststructuralist lens, using critical thematic analysis. Themes developed from news media data from the 1960s included topics related to psychological intervention and the normalizing function of kindergarten, views of potentially deficient mothers and their replacement by kindergarten teachers, as well as fears of juvenile delinquency tied to understandings of modernity. From the election period in 2018, themes related to early schooling as a panacea for vulnerability were discussed, as well as shifting discourses tied to motherhood/parenting, the spectre of the "bad mother", and anxieties surrounding Québécois identity and nationhood. Finally, deficit discourses tied to neoliberal influences and human capital theory in early years education were addressed. Similarities and differences between the two time periods were noted, as well as shifts in the inclusion or exclusion of specific voices in public discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".