MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7105679072 · doi:10.24400/527896/a03-2025.4153

PATASWOT: Comprehending the physical processes impacting the PATAgonian southwestern continental shelf and adjacent open ocean using SWOT data

2025· article· W7105679072 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinental shelfPhysical oceanographySWOT analysisPelagic zoneOpen waterOcean currentWater massCurrent (fluid)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of PATASWOT is to enhance our understanding of the physical processes affecting the Patagonian continental shelf and adjacent open ocean using SWOT data, traditional satellite altimetry, in situ observations and model outputs. This objective is guided by the following key research questions: (Q1) What are the main physical drivers underlying the high biological activity observed over the Patagonian shelf and slope? (Q2) Does the Malvinas Current (MC) act more as a blender or as a barrier between open ocean and shelf waters? (Q3) How are the lower levels of the trophic web, –nutrients and phytoplankton- structured within the water column and how are these distributions associated with the physical characteristic of water masses on the Patagonian shelf, slope, and beyond the MC into the open ocean? To address these questions, we propose the following specific objectives: i) Validate SWOT data and geophysical correction against in situ data in the Patagonian continental shelf and open ocean; ii) Identify the physical processes measured by SWOT during the initial 1-day repeat orbit; Iii) Characterize the water exchange between the Patagonian shelf and open ocean; iv) Discern submesoscale dynamics that modulate the distribution of surface chlorophyll, heat and carbon fluxes; v) Assess the short-term evolution of the phytoplankton community composition and biomass. The required data will be obtained through Eulerian and Lagrangian experiments. These experiments will be conducted during an oceanographic cruise on R/V Falkor (too) scheduled for September-October 2025 on the upper slope of the shelf-break. The Eulerian experiment will include physical observations (temperature, pressure, salinity, currents) using three fixed moorings. The Lagrangian experiment will involve deploying a dense array of drifters (N = 54) drogued at depths of 50 cm and 15 m. The research vessel will track the drifters, and multiple water column samples will be collected at various depths. Additionally, time series of in situ current velocities and sea level measurements are already available to validate SWOT observations during the Cal/Val period over the Patagonian shelf, as well as 23 Lagrangian trajectories collected in the Brazil Current.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→