MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105797802 · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02432-9_1

Introduction: Reconsidering Social Policy Reform in Africa

2025· book-chapter· en· W7105797802 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal dynamics of social policy · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)Social policyState (computer science)DecolonizationSocial changeColonialismPandemicPublic policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract From decolonisation and nation-building after independence to structural adjustments to the implementation of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals and, more recently, of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, social policy reform in sub-Saharan Africa has witnessed gradual changes but also more sudden and dramatic episodes caused by global crisis, including the recent worldwide pandemic. This Introduction to The State and the Imperative for Social Policy Reform in Africa explains how the volume explores social policy changes that have been made before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes that need to be made towards protecting individuals, families, and communities against exposure to insecurity, poverty, and other vulnerabilities throughout the lifecycle. The Introduction is divided into three main sections. The first section offers a brief overview of social policy development in sub-Saharan Africa since the colonial era. The second section provides a short discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath on the African continent. Finally, the last section offers an overview of the chapters that comprise the volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal dynamics of social policySame topicHuman Rights and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207