MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106007475 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.020

Cretaceous palynoevents in the circum-Arctic region

2025· article· en· W7106007475 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsPalynologyCretaceousDinoflagellateAcritarchDinocystPollenBiostratigraphyCenomanian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cretaceous Period was a time generally of high sea levels, peaking in the Cenomanian and Turonian. With sea-level rise, the extent of shelf seas expanded, providing broad opportunities for plankton such as cystproducing dinoflagellates, which reached their maximum species richness during the Cretaceous. Because of their abundance, species richness, rapid evolution and distinctive morphology, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts (dinocysts) have become the most important palynological index fossils for the period. Dinocysts are almost exclusively marine, and marine successions are extensive through the Cretaceous and across the Arctic. Spores and pollen (miospores), which are almost exclusively of terrestrial origin, are less prominent as index fossils in the Early Cretaceous: taxa tend to be long-ranging and taxonomy poorly constrained. However, with the advent of angiosperms and the increasing diversity and distinctiveness in the Late Cretaceous, pollen become more useful biostratigraphically upsection. Extensive zonation schemes based on palynomorphs have been proposed from Arctic Canada, Greenland and northern Russia, but they tend to be disparate, with little commonality or mutual correlation. For that reason, we have chosen to identify Cretaceous palynological bioevents (palynoevents) that potentially extend around the Arctic. We have identified 187 bioevents: 99 first occurrences and 87 last occurrences and 129 involving dinocysts and 58 involving miospores. The bioevents have been calibrated insofar as possible to independent age control, such as biozonation schemes based on ammonites and bivalves. The relationships of each event to stages and key fossil zonal schemes is shown on chronostratigraphic plots using the 2020 version of TimeScale Creator®.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207