MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106032836 · doi:10.7939/83552

Nested Association Mapping to Identify Stripe Rust Resistance in Spring Wheat

2025· dissertation· en· W7106032836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusStripe rustAssociation mappingCultivarPopulationResistance (ecology)Inclusive composite interval mappingPuccinia striiformisGenetic linkagePlant disease resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis Westend. f. sp. tritici Erikss. (Pst), is one of the most devastating diseases affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). It is one of the five ‘priority one’ diseases for which a minimum level of resistance is required when registering a wheat cultivar with desirable traits. Among all the available management approaches, genetic resistance is the most effective, easy-to-use, and environmentally friendly approach to combating stripe rust. Researchers are fighting a never-ending war against the ever-evolving dynamic population of the pathogen. Thus, the continuous identification of new sources of resistance is essential for breeding resistant wheat cultivars. In this study, we developed three nested association mapping (NAM) populations (n = 741, 575, and 1098), consisting of 16 RIL families. These populations were developed in the genetic background of susceptible wheat cultivars Avocet, Vesper, and Cardale by crossing with 6, 6, and 4 new, diverse, and resistant source lines, respectively. Comprehensive phenotypic evaluations of the NAM populations were conducted in multiple environments to quantify disease severity. Following phenotypic evaluation, all lines were genotyped using a wheat 7K SNP assay, generating a robust marker dataset for genetic analyses. Linkage maps for each RIL family were constructed, and these were further integrated into a consensus map to facilitate joint QTL mapping for each NAM population. Major QTL were defined as those explaining more than 20% of the phenotypic variance, whereas stable QTL were consistently detected across multiple environments. 34 major and stable QTL were identified from 16 RIL families using composite interval mapping (CIM). The most significant and stable QTL from individual families were QYr.lrdc-7B.2, QYr.lrdc-7D (RIL family 3: Avocet/P2382), QYr.lrdc-5D (RIL family 5: Avocet/P2432), QYr.lrdc-1A.1 (RIL family 8: Vesper/P2686), QYr.lrdc-7B.1, QYr.lrdc-7B.2 (RIL family 10: Vesper/P2688), QYr.lrdc-2B (RIL family 12: Vesper/P2265), and QYr.lrdc-2B (RIL family 16: Cardale/P2703), with the phenotypic variance explained (PVE) ranging from 31% to 62%. Joint mapping of NAM populations 1, 2, and 3 was carried out to identify 20, 21, and 14 QTL, respectively. In the individual family analyses, we were able to detect family-specific loci; however, the power was limited because each family only segregated for a subset of alleles. By combining all families into the NAM framework, we increased both mapping resolution and statistical power. Furthermore, several QTL were only revealed through joint mapping, demonstrating the added power of combining information across families. The overlapping chromosomal regions across multiple RIL families indicate genomic regions consistently contributing stripe rust resistance. These results show that NAM population is a powerful tool for dissecting complex traits and discovering new resistance alleles. The major-effect QTL and their linked molecular markers offer valuable resources for marker-assisted selection. Overall, the study provides a clear understanding of the genetic architecture of stripe rust resistance in wheat to accelerate the Canadian wheat breeding program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207