MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106032959 · doi:10.7939/83086

Enhancing Travel Ease: Designing an Integrated Platform for Camping Trip Planning in Alberta, Canada

2025· dissertation· en· W7106032959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIPS architectureUsabilityProcess (computing)Key (lock)Identity (music)Information sharingSocial mediaDigital mapping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alberta’s diverse natural landscapes make it an attractive destination for camping, yet young adults often face barriers when organizing short camping trips. Essential information about campsites, activities, transportation, budgeting, and social connection is scattered across multiple platforms, while existing tools address only parts of the process. As a result, planning can feel fragmented, costly, and socially isolating. This thesis responds by proposing Campac, an integrated digital platform designed to simplify camping trip planning for young adults in Alberta. Through a combination of literature review, user surveys, and expert interviews, the research identifies common challenges: fragmented and inconsistent information, limited access to affordable gear and transportation, and difficulties in finding travel companions. These insights informed a user-centered design process that guided the development of the platform. The resulting concept consolidates trip planning into four core sections: Explore for discovering campsites, activities, and budget-friendly options; Profile for personalized experience; Community for discussions and connections; and Feeds for sharing trips and resources. The platform’s visual identity draws on nature-inspired graphic elements and accessible typography to foster usability. Prototyping across both web and mobile ensured consistency, while usability testing confirmed the value of centralizing resources and emphasized the importance of clear navigation and inclusive features. Findings indicate that Campac addresses key gaps in existing camping services by unifying scattered resources, supporting affordability, and fostering community. While the project was limited by a small survey sample and prototype-level testing, it provides a strong foundation for future development, including broader user studies and integration with official park databases. Overall, the research demonstrates how a user-centered digital platform can make outdoor recreation more convenient for young adults by transforming fragmented information into a cohesive and supportive experience. By bridging logistical, social, and financial barriers, Campac demonstrates how design can enhance not only the practicality of camping but also the sense of connection and confidence among young adventurers. In doing so, the project highlights the broader role of visual communication design in shaping meaningful, inclusive experiences in outdoor camping and activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207