АРХЕОБОТАНИЧЕСКАЯ КОЛЛЕКЦИЯ СЕЛИЩА ГНЕЗДИЛОВО 6 И ЕЕ МЕСТО В КОНТЕКСТЕ СИНХРОННЫХ ПОСЕЛЕНИЙ
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье представлены результаты анализа археоботанической коллекции поселения второй четверти I тыс. н. э. Гнездилово 6. Культурные растения представлены четырьмя видами злаков – просом обыкновенным, пленчатым ячменем, пшеницей двузернянкой и мягкой пшеницей. Дикорастущие пищевые виды представлены находками скорлупы лесного ореха. Сравнение полученных данных с материалами из трех синхронных поселений бассейнов Оки и Волги показало значительную близость состава основных зерновых культур, однако в их долевых соотношениях наблюдаются некоторые расхождения. Наблюдаемое сходство в некоторых формах и орнаментации керамических сосудов наряду с археоботаническими материалами позволяет выдвинуть предположение о некоторой общности населения обширного региона, по крайней мере, в отдельных аспектах хозяйства и материальной культуры. The paper presents the results of the analysis of the archaeobotanical collection from Gnezdilovo 6. The site is a settlement dating to the second quarter of the 1st millennium AD. Domesticated plants are represented by four types of cereal species, namely, broomcorn millet, husked barley, emmer wheat and soft wheat. Wild edible species are represented by the finds of hazelnut shell. The comparison of the data obtained and the materials from three contemporaneous settlements from the Oka and Volga regions has shown great similarity in the list of main cereal species identified; yet percentage shares of cereals are somewhat different. Similarity in some shapes and ornamentation of ceramic vessels has been identified as well, suggesting that the population groups inhabiting this vast region had some common features, at least, related to specific characteristics of economy and material culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it