MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106263400 · doi:10.17632/y77dcryp2w

The Effect of Minimum Wage on Suicide Rates

2025· dataset· W7106263400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnemploymentMinimum wagePopulationPublic expenditureStatutory lawSocioeconomic statusPublic healthWagePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main hypothesis of this study is that minimum wages may influence suicide mortality. The dataset consists of annual observations for 30 OECD countries with statutory minimum wage systems—Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, the United Kingdom, Turkiye, and the United States. It includes key socioeconomic indicators such as suicide mortality, minimum wages, unemployment rates, GDP, public social expenditure, health expenditure, fertility, divorce rates andalcohol consumption. The dataset integrates multiple thematic databases, including OECD Health Statistics, Labour Market Statistics, National Accounts Statistics, the Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), and the OECD Family Database. Suicide mortality data are derived from age-standardised death rates from intentional self-harm, adjusted to the 2015 OECD standard population and based on the WHO Mortality Database. Minimum wage data use the real hourly statutory minimum wage converted into 2024 USD PPPs. Economic indicators include unemployment rates—standardised using constant PPP-based measures—along with expenditure-approach GDP and GDP per capita, both reported in chain-linked volume terms and deflated to constant 2020 PPPs. Social indicators include demographic and behavioural measures such as total fertility rates, crude divorce rates, and female labour force participation. Fiscal expenditure indicators consist of per-capita public social expenditure—measured as spending on public programmes from the SOCX database—and per-capita health expenditure under government or compulsory schemes, both reported in constant PPPs. Health-related indicator includes per-capita alcohol. For ease of coefficient interpretation, minimum wage, GDP, public social expenditure per capita, health expenditure per capita, and alcohol consumption were log-transformed. This dataset consists of annual indicators for 30 OECD countries and allows researchers to examine both cross-country heterogeneity and temporal dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0260.016
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207