MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106315864 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2025.0376

Social dynamics can delay or prevent climate tipping points by speeding the adoption of climate change mitigation

2025· article· en· W7106315864 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcosystem dynamics and resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTipping point (physics)Climate changePermafrostSocial dynamicsClimate change mitigationClimate modelRunaway climate changeSystem dynamicsScenario analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social dynamics are increasingly integrated into climate change models, yet tipping points in coupled social-climate systems remain understudied. This is concerning given that processes like permafrost thaw and forest dieback can trigger positive feedback loops that accelerate carbon release and global warming. We have developed a coupled model combining an Earth system component with a social behaviour model, each including tipping mechanisms. The climate model includes an additional carbon release term representing tipping reservoirs. The social model captures opinion dynamics shaped by social learning rates, mitigation costs and the strength of social norms. Our results show that weak social norms have little effect on tipping dynamics. However, faster social learning can delay or even prevent climate tipping by accelerating mitigation responses. Simulations reveal nonlinear, regime-dependent dynamics, with bifurcation-like behaviour separating tipping and no-tipping pathways. In some scenarios, a climate tipping point can trigger secondary tipping in social behaviour. Crucially, the model enables estimation of the time to tipping, offering a forward-looking risk measure. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating social feedbacks in climate models to better anticipate, and potentially avoid, catastrophic tipping events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicEcosystem dynamics and resilienceFrench-language works237,207