MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106430199 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2025.3635722

An Incipient Fault Location Scheme Utilizing Synchronous Waveform Measurements in Distribution Systems

2025· article· W7106430199 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFault (geology)Fault indicatorWaveformUpstream (networking)Line (geometry)Fault detection and isolationFault coveragePower (physics)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incipient faults frequently occur in underground cables due to the widespread aging of power distribution infrastructure. These faults are self-clearing with short duration, posing significant challenges for accurately pinpointing their locations. This paper proposes a novel incipient fault location scheme for medium-voltage underground distribution systems in North America, leveraging synchronized waveform measurement units (WMUs). Initially, zero-sequence fault voltage models at the fault point are derived from upstream and downstream WMU measurements, incorporating system topology and parameters. Utilizing these zero-sequence fault voltage models, a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) framework is developed to estimate the fault distance for each line segment, with a whitening process applied to mitigate the effects of correlated noise. Subsequently, a candidate fault line segment is identified for each path from the substation to the end of each branch. Finally, the fault location is pinpointed within one of the candidate fault line segments, using the corresponding fault distance estimation result and the depth between the substation and candidate fault line segments, along with a truncated mean square error (MSE). The performance of the proposed scheme is evaluated in PSCAD/EMTDC based on the IEEE 33-Bus and 123-Bus Test Feeders with various fault types, parameters and locations. The simulation results indicate that the proposed scheme achieves high accuracy in fault location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207