MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106465644 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/7vtnw

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Pharmacogenetic Allele and Genotype Frequencies in the Vietnamese Population Compared With Global Populations

2025· other· W7106465644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseGenotypePharmacogeneticsPopulationGenotypingAllele frequencyAllelePersonalized medicineGenotype frequency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Genetic variability plays a crucial role in drug metabolism, treatment response, and the risk of adverse drug reactions. Allele frequencies of pharmacogenetically relevant genes such as CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, NAT2, SLCO1B1, UGT1A1, and ABCB1 vary significantly across populations. In Vietnam, existing studies remain scattered and limited in sample size, lacking a comprehensive synthesis. A systematic comparison between the Vietnamese population and major global populations is essential for precision medicine and rational drug policy development. Objectives: (1) To systematically collect and estimate allele and genotype frequencies of pharmacogenetically relevant genes in the Vietnamese population. (2) To compare allele/genotype distributions between Vietnamese and major global populations, including East Asian, South Asian, European, African, and Admixed American populations. (3) To generate pooled estimates and genetic distribution maps informing personalized medicine and drug regulatory policies. Methods: A systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Vietnamese national journals. Additional population data will be retrieved from the 1000 Genomes Project, gnomAD, and ALFA databases. Eligible study designs include cross-sectional, cohort, population genetic, and clinical studies reporting allele or genotype frequencies. Data extraction will include SNP identifiers, genotype counts (AA, Aa, aa), allele frequency, sample size, ethnic subgroup, and genotyping methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale appropriate for genetic epidemiology. Meta-analysis of proportions will be performed using random-effects models (Freeman–Tukey transformation). Subgroup analyses will be stratified by gene, ethnic group (Kinh vs. minorities), and genomic dataset. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using I² and Q statistics. Expected Outcomes: This review will provide pooled allele and genotype frequencies for major pharmacogenes in Vietnam and comparative data across global populations. The findings will support clinical pharmacogenetics implementation, personalized dosing strategies, and national drug regulation policies. Registration Purpose: This protocol is preregistered on OSF to ensure transparency, prevent selective reporting, and strengthen methodological rigor prior to conducting data extraction and meta-analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.026
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207