Comparative Mitogenomics of Pedetontus and Pedetontinus (Insecta: Archaeognatha) Unveils Phylogeny, Divergence History, and Adaptive Evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeognatha is phylogenetically positioned as the basal lineage relative to all extant insect orders and comprises approximately 600 described species. The internal phylogenetic relationships and divergence times within this ancient order have long been a subject of scientific debate. In this study, we assembled 14 mitochondrial genomes from species within the genera Pedetontus and Pedetontinus to clarify the phylogenetic relationship and estimate divergence times within Archaeognatha. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that both Machilidae and Machilinae are paraphyletic; Pedetontinus included in this analysis formed a well-supported monophyletic clade, whereas the sampled Pedetontus species were not recovered as a monophyletic clade. Divergence time estimates indicate that Archaeognatha originated during the Late Carboniferous (301.15 Mya, 95% HPD: 298.88–303.67 Mya), with subsequent diversification spanning from the Mesozoic era to the present. The adaptive radiation of epiphytic bryophytes and potential coevolutionary interactions between plants and insects are proposed to have significantly contributed to the diversification of Archaeognatha. Based on multiple lines of evidence, we propose that the current morphological criteria for species delineation within Pedetontus (Pd.) require revision to better reflect its evolutionary history. In the branch-site model analysis, when Pd. silvestrii—collected from temperate regions—was designated as the foreground branch, two positively selected sites were detected at the 66th position of the Cytb and the 34th position of ATP6. When Pd. hainanensis and Pd. bawanglingensis—collected from tropical regions—were used as the foreground branches, six positively selected sites were identified at the 622nd position of Cytb, the 499th position of ATP6, and the 623rd, 873rd, 1106th, and 1141st positions of COI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".