MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106800482 · doi:10.5539/jel.v15n2p133

A Program to Enhance Teachers’ Instructional Management for Developing Students’ Modern Technology Skills at the College of Agriculture and Technology under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission

2025· article· W7106800482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVocational and Entrepreneurial Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationAgricultural educationCommissionSkills managementTechnology educationInformation technologySample (material)Learning Management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this research are to 1. Study the components, indicators, current conditions, desired conditions, essential needs, and guidelines for enhancing teachers' learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission. 2. Develop a program to enhance teachers' learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission. 3. Study the outcomes of using the program to enhance teachers' learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission.The sample group consists of school administrators and teachers. The sample size was determined according to Krejcie and Morgan’s table, totaling 140 participants, selected by multistage random sampling. The key informants include 7 experts, selected by purposive sampling. The instrument used was a questionnaire, with reliability coefficients of 0.91 for the current condition section and 0.95 for the desired condition section. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Priority Need Index (PNI modified). Research findings revealed that: 1.The components of teachers’ learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission consist of 3 components and 12 indicators, including: 1.Curriculum aspect 2.Learning management aspect 3.Measurement and evaluation aspect The appropriateness evaluation result was at a good level. 2.The current condition of teachers’ learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission was generally at a good level, while the desired condition was at a very good level overall. When considering the needs by aspect, the highest priority was the learning management aspect, followed by the curriculum aspect, and then the measurement and evaluation aspect. 3.The guidelines for enhancing teachers’ learning management to develop modern technology skills of students at Agricultural and Technology Colleges under the Office of the Vocational Education Commission are based on the following development principles: 1.Learning from experience (70%) 2.Learning from others (20%) 3.Learning from curriculum (10%) The approaches to teacher development include: 1.Learning by doing 2.Self-directed learning 3.Mentoring 4.Knowledge exchange 5.Training workshops Implementing development according to these guidelines helps teachers continuously improve their skills, knowledge, and professional characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it