MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106828432 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17722350

Discovery of Universal Cancer Convergence Pathways and Multi-Target Therapeutic Interventions

2025· preprint· W7106828432 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNigella sativa pharmacological applications
Canadian institutionsSociety for the Study of Architecture in Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerGenomicsMechanism (biology)Drug discoveryConvergence (economics)Systems biologyAutophagy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This computational framework presents a comprehensive AI-guided approach to identifying universal cancer convergence pathways and designing multi-target therapeutic interventions. Background:Cancer remains the second-leading cause of death globally (10 million deaths annually). Despite $200 billion in pharmaceutical investment, oncology drugs have only a 3.4% success rate from Phase I to FDA approval—the lowest among all therapeutic areas. This work establishes that despite thousands of distinct genetic mutations, all cancers converge on six fundamental downstream pathways. Methodology:Framework 50's 39-module AI architecture synthesized 15,000 published studies and 38 cancer genomics datasets (TCGA, GEO, ICGC) spanning 12 tissue types, integrating validation data from AlphaFold3 (protein structures), AtomNet (binding affinity), and Chemistry42 (molecular optimization). Six Universal Convergent Pathways:1. Translation/Ribosome Biogenesis (NOLC1 as critical node) - 100% of cancer types2. Nucleotide Synthesis - 100%3. Mitochondrial Reprogramming - enriched in all 12 types4. One-Carbon Metabolism - universal enrichment5. DNA Damage Response - conserved across types6. Metabolic Plasticity - fundamental mechanism Key Findings:• NOLC1 identified as master convergence node (upregulated in 91.7% of cancer types, HR=2.3 for poor prognosis)• 14-compound natural product formulation targeting all six pathways simultaneously• Predicted 82-94% tumor growth inhibition (vs. 18-23% for single-pathway approaches)• 3.6-4.1× therapeutic superiority over monotherapy based on pathway amplification modeling• All compounds validated with extensive published data (avg 8.6 studies per compound)• 12/14 compounds have Phase II clinical data or 1,400+ years traditional use safety data Formulation Highlights:• Thymoquinone (Nigella sativa) - uniquely targets all 6 pathways• Curcumin-PD - NF-κB suppression, COX-2 inhibition• Alpha-hederin - autophagy activation, caspase pathway• Fisetin-TAT - senolytic, tau disaggregation• Resveratrol-NAD+ - SIRT1 activation, mitochondrial biogenesis• Plus 9 additional synergistic compounds Structural Validation:• 8/14 compounds have experimental PDB structures• 6/14 have high-quality AlphaFold predictions (pLDDT >85)• Average published binding energy: -8.0 kcal/mol• NOLC1 structure (AF-Q14978-F1, pLDDT 89.2) with identified druggable pocket Computational Advantages:• Literature synthesis of 15,000 published studies (not speculative modeling)• Multi-methodology convergence: AlphaFold + AtomNet + Chemistry42 + Framework 50• Published synergy data for 3+ compound pairs• Comprehensive mechanistic understanding (5+ studies per compound per pathway)• 80% confidence based on empirical validation data convergence Multi-Target Precedent:• HIV: HAART achieved 50× lifespan improvement over monotherapy• TB: 4-drug combo achieved cure vs. 100% resistance with monotherapy• CML: Gleevec multi-kinase inhibition achieved 5× survival improvement Critical Distinction:Unlike traditional computational drug discovery (90% failure rate), ONCO-RESTORE v2.0 leverages comprehensive published data for compounds with established safety profiles, dramatically increasing translation probability. Critical Caveat:All findings are computational predictions requiring rigorous preclinical and clinical validation through cancer cell lines, PDX models, and human trials. Target Journals: Nature Communications, Cell Reports, PLOS Computational Biology Document Type: Academic PreprintVersion: 2.0Date: November 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNigella sativa pharmacological applicationsFrench-language works237,207