MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106839555 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726301

Clean Two-Dimensional Floquet Time Crystal Stabilized for 5000+ Periods by a Purely Imaginary Spiral-Twist Phase

2025· preprint· W7106839555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFloquet theoryAmplitudeImaginary timeHamiltonian (control theory)Phase noiseMagnetic fieldLattice (music)Phase (matter)Noise (video)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate a clean, disorder-free two-dimensional Floquet time crystal on a $30\times30$ square lattice with periodic boundaries that achieves full wavefunction fidelity $>0.9996$ after 50 periods and $>0.9957$ after 5000 periods ($\sim$4 minutes of evolution at 20~Hz drive frequency). The system is driven by a globally uniform transverse field $h(t)\sum_i\sigma^x_i$ and a purely imaginary spiral-twist interaction $iJ\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\sin(\theta_{ij})\sigma^z_i\sigma^z_j$, with $\theta_{ij}(t)$ a slow, center-origin spiral phase profile of maximum amplitude $\pi/512$. Mean-field product-state evolution in the 1800-dimensional amplitude space, integrated with fourth-order Runge--Kutta (200 steps/period), accurately captures the dynamics and reveals that the imaginary twist passively suppresses Floquet heating for thousands of cycles without disorder, measurement feedback, or long-range interactions. An attempted hardware validation on a 9-qubit patch of IBM Sherbrooke (1.05~million physical gates, 50 periods) yielded only classical readout noise (Bhattacharyya fidelity $0.305\pm0.018$ on four marked qubits, no detectable subharmonic response), confirming that individual addressing and mid-circuit measurement destroy the required coherence. The Hamiltonian maps directly to a single global RF beam plus one static linear magnetic gradient on existing 2D trapped-ion arrays, providing a scalable route to ultra-stable logical qubits and low-frequency (~10--200~Hz) isotope and chiral separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207