From Story to Stewardship: Indigenous Perspectives on Conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“When the world was first created, Patsallht, First Born, thought he was the only one on Earth. He was given a medicine box. In the medicine box, there was a “mukw” (sacred medicine)....He traveled on foot to the head of South Bentinck, Ats’aax. Along the way, First Born met a beautiful woman wearing a red blanket. He fell in love with her. She proposed to him, asking him to get married. He agreed. She told him, ‘close your eyes,’ and she built him a beautiful home out of hemlock. He opened his eyes and was amazed at how quickly she was able to complete their home. First Born and his wife, the grizzly bear woman, raised a puppy as if it were a child. This puppy was very unique for his paws and his feet were like those of a human being. Sometimes, his wife would leave for three or four days and not tell First Born where she had gone. During those times, she reverted back to being a grizzly bear. When First Born found out that the woman that he married was really a grizzly bear, he left her for good. She became a grizzly bear and never returned to being the woman that First Born had married…” —The Story of ISTA [1] This story is one part of The Story of ISTA, which has been passed down for generations of Nuxalk people along the Central Coast of British Columbia. The Nuxalk, also known as the Bella Coola, is an Indigenous First Nation of the Pacific Northwest Coast in what is now British Columbia, Canada. For millennia, they have maintained a profound connection and stewarded this land, with grizzly bears roaming the temperate rainforest. Like other stories of Indigenous peoples, Nuxalk’s stories capture the deep interconnectedness between humans and other-than-human worlds. In this narrative, the grizzly bear is not merely an animal but a human kin with shared histories and relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.039 | 0.055 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".