MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106850656 · doi:10.14288/cjur.vi.195268

Intergenerational differences in integration experiences between first-generation immigrants and their second-generation children

2021· article· en· W7106850656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationImmigrationEthnic groupNegotiationMainstreamContext (archaeology)Social integrationIdentity (music)Ethnic community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical data from the 2016 census shows that immigrants from the South Asian subcontinent, who identify as the first-generation East Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Punjabi or Tamil, represent the second largest ethnic community in Canada (Statistics Canada, 2016). A majority of these individuals comprise families who raise their children in Canada, commonlyknown as the second-generation (Somerville and Robinson, 2016). Thus, the first-generation’s acquired human capital is of poignance in facilitating their children’s integration, which impacts their financial success and educational attainments, underlying differences in the social context of the host country (Boyd, 2002; Portes et al., 2009). As the second-generation children struggle with their integration experiences, they adopt selective acculturation as a plausible integration strategy to adapt to the mainstream Western culture, while retaining aspects of their unique ethnic identities (Portes and Zhou, 1993; Portes et al., 2005). Within the South Asian diaspora, immigrant parents play an influential role in shaping their children’s future through educational and professional experiences, accompanied byprominent ethnic ties within their community (Abada and Tenkorang, 2009; Boyd, 2002). However, as a part of their selective acculturation process, the second-generation youth often experience intergenerational conflict, marked by identity negotiation tensions and cultural dissonance (Giguere et al. 2010; Stroink et al. 2009). There has been growing academic interest that explores immigrant relationships between parents and their children across diverse ethnic enclaves in the United States and Canada. However, few studies have attempted to establish the negotiation of generational attitudes that aid in fostering positive communication and lower levels of intergenerational conflict. Thus, the research questions in this project seek to examine the following: (i) How do individual beliefs and values shape communication between the first-generation parents and their second-generation young adults?, and (ii) How do second-generation young adults negotiate their bicultural identities? Structured interviews were conducted with three families that consisted of the first-generation parent and their second-generation young adult across the South Asian Canadian community. This was followed by a thematic analysis to exemplify the counter influence of the prevalent beliefs and values between the two generations. The findings exemplified thatacknowledgment of differences in generational beliefs, with a degree of adherence to familial and cultural expectations, allowed the first-generation parents to harbour their children’s autonomy and emphasize the importance of life-long contentment. The second-generation women also expressed a strong allegiance to their cultural values imparted by their parents. However, their challenge of experiences related to social integration resulted in normative parent-child conflicts, creating an extensive process of identity negotiation through skilful communication strategies (Rajiva, 2006; Rajiva, 2009; Sundar, 2008). Therefore, the findings demonstrate the importance of mutual acknowledgment and understanding of the differences underlying assimilation experiences, which allowed them to foster happiness and establish a trustworthy parent-child relationship. This research study bears positive implications for policy makers and legislative reformers. The focus should be on implementing strategies that diversify understandings of various ethnic diasporas, to harbour the true meaning of multiculturalism which in return, could serve to mitigate normative family conflicts across immigrant communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207