MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106856364 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726930

Acalypha burmanii I. Montero & Cardiel

2023· article· W7106856364 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndemismConservation statusLittoral zoneThreatened speciesRange (aeronautics)Vegetation (pathology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8. Acalypha burmanii I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 108: 93 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2018a). Tragia filiformis Poir., Encyclopédie méthodique. Botanique. Paris 7: 727 (Poiret 1806). — Acalypha acuminata Vahl ex. Baill., Adansonia, Recueil d’observations botaniques 1: 267 (Baillon 1861) nom. illeg., non A. acuminata Benth. (Bentham 1854). — Type: Madagascar?: s.l., s.d., P. Commerson? s.n. (holo-, P-LAM [P00367371]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Baillon (1891: pl. 188.); Fig. 24E. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors Dutch botanist Nicolaus Laurens Burman (1743-1793). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar, probably from northeast Madagascar (Fénérive, Toamasina Province). Littoral forest. On sandstone. Altitudinal range unknown (Fig. 21). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha burmanii is known from two collections, one collected in 1771 by P. Commerson without locality but probably from northeastern Madagascar, and the other collected in Fénérive by d’Alleizette in 1906. It occurs in littoral forests, which are the most threatened vegetation zone in Madagascar (Bollen & Donati 2006; Andriamandimbiarisoa et al. 2015). Although data are too limited to estimate its EOO and AOO, Acalypha burmanii is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Critically Endangered, CR B2ab(ii,iii) (probably EX). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 2 collections. Madagascar. Commerson, P. s.n. (G[G00324451], P[P04779529, P00324459, P00324460, P00799456], P-LAM[P00367371]); d’Alleizette, Ch. s.n. (L[L0242529]). REFERENCES. — Müller Argoviensis (1865: 40) as A. spiciflora Burm.f.; Müller Argoviensis (1866: 867) as A. spiciflora; Baillon (1891: tab. 188) as A. acuminata; Baillon (1892: 1004) as A. acuminata; Heckel (1903: 198) as A. acuminata; Palacký (1907: 24) as A. acuminata; Pax & Hoffmann (1924: 137) as A. spiciflora; Leandri (1942: 269) as A. spiciflora; Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 93). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, probably deciduous, height unknown, monoecious. Branches subglabrous, with sparse, simple, short trichomes. Axillary buds subspherical, to 1 × 1.2 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, light brown, glabrous. Stipules to 4 mm long, linear-lanceolate, margin ciliate and with some sessile glands. Petioles 0.5-1 cm long, indumentum similar to that on branches. Leaf blades 2.5-5.5 × 1.8-3 cm, elliptic to elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to acute; apex acuminate, acumen to 12 mm long, rounded; margin crenate-serrate, teeth rounded; upper surface glabrous; lower surface subglabrous, with simple, short trichomes on veins; margins ciliate in sinuses; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 3-4 per side. Stipels glandular, to 0.3 mm long, glabrous. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, axillary, to 7 cm long, mostly male with short female segment; peduncle filiform, to 15 mm long, it and rachis subglabrous, with some sparse, simple, short trichomes. Female segment to 2 cm long; bracts 1-2, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 10 × 11 mm, subelliptic, almost glabrous, with some sparse, simple trichomes; margin subentire, slightly discolored; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 4 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.7 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds not seen. Female flowers 2 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 1 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy with simple, short, arachnoid trichomes; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, papillose, surface puberulent with simple, short trichomes; styles 3, to 3 mm long, connate at thickened base, sparsely hairy on rachis, each divided into c. 14 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 6 mm diameter, papillose, papillae to 1 mm long, surface sparsely hairy with simple, short, curved trichomes. Seeds c. 3 × 2 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate. NOTES We propose Acalypha burmanii as a new name for Tragia filiformis Poir. (Montero Muñoz et al. 2018a) because combining T. filiformis under Acalypha is blocked by A. filiformis Poir.; nor could we use the illegitimate name A. acuminata Baill. See also comments under the excluded species A. spiciflora.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207