Exploring Hong Kong Newcomer Post-Secondary Students' Perceptions of Their Mental Health and of Mental Health Services and Supports in the Ottawa-Gatineau Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this research study was to explore the perceptions of Hong Kong newcomer post-secondary students of their mental health and of mental health services and supports in the Ottawa-Gatineau region. Existing research indicates that Hong Kong newcomers experience challenges in their host countries but are reluctant to seek mental health services and support. This study seeks to answer the following overarching research question: How do Hong Kong newcomer post-secondary students perceive their mental health and the mental health services and supports in the Ottawa-Gatineau region? As part of this overall objective, the study aimed to understand a) the challenges and stresses the students encountered since coming to Canada that could impact their mental health, b) their utilization of mental health services available to them in the Ottawa-Gatineau region and beyond, c) the strategies they used to alleviate mental health challenges, and d) the recommendations they had regarding mental health services in the Ottawa-Gatineau region. Methods: A qualitative study based on 10 semi-structured interviews with Hong Kong newcomer post-secondary students was conducted. The transcripts were analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches based on Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-step thematic analysis process. Results: Participants shared and elaborated on their post immigration experiences and on their perceptions of their mental health. Common immigration challenges upon arrival included language, financial and social challenges. Most participants had never sought mental health care for various reasons including fear of stigma and lack of awareness of available services. Participants generally relied on their existing social networks to obtain mental health support and suggested the need to increase awareness of services to encourage help-seekers. Conclusion: The participants' responses largely agreed with existing research findings, but also highlight the importance of considering unique individual experiences, which can vary vastly. The findings from this study can help policy makers, health providers and managers make informed decisions for improving mental health care experiences for Hong Kong newcomer students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".