MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7108074094 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025zan57cm8

Cardiovascular Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients After Exposure to Immunosuppression for Treatment of Glomerulonephritis

2025· article· en· W7108074094 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosuppressionGlomerulonephritisKidney transplantKidneyKidney diseaseNephrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant recipients. Kidney transplant patients with ESKD from glomerulonephritis (GN) may receive significant pre-transplant immunosuppression (PTI). While immunosuppression is crucial therapy, it may contribute to increased CV risk. The influence of prior immunosuppression on post-transplant CV outcomes remains unexplored. Methods: This retrospective study included adult and pediatric kidney transplant recipients at our institution between January 2005 and March 2020. We included patients with GN as cause of ESKD who received PTI, while the control group included GN patients without PTI and those transplanted for hypertension, polycystic kidney disease, congenital abnormalities of the kidneys and urinary tract, or Alport's syndrome. Patients with diabetes as a cause of ESKD were excluded. The study outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) post-transplant, including non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal cerebrovascular accident (CVA), unstable angina (UA), hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. Results: We identified 763 kidney transplant recipients: 184 had GN with PTI, 147 had GN without PTI, and 432 non-GN patients. Rates of MI, CVA, HF, UA, and mortality were compared among groups (Table). Overall, MACE events were higher in both GN with PTI and GN without PTI groups when compared to the non-GN group. GN with PTI had elevated risk of MACE when compared to the overall control group (21.7% vs 12.6%). Conclusion: Kidney transplant recipients with ESKD due to GN experienced higher rates of MACE and overall mortality compared to non-GN patients. These findings suggest that while higher cumulative immunosuppression burden due to PTI may not be associated with MACE, underlying native disease may have an impact that continues after transplantation. While these are preliminary results with a small population, this study provides a foundation for better understanding how PTI and GNs can independently impact CV risk in kidney transplant recipients. Summary of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Post-Transplant - Native Disease (n) MI (n,%) CVA (n,%) HF (n,%) UA (n,%) CV death (n,%) Total MACE (n,%) Mortality (n,%) GN with PTI (184) 11 (5.98) 3 (1.63) 13 (7.07) 6 (3.26) 7 (3.80) 40 (21.74) 35 (19.02) Control GN without PTI (147) 12 (8.16) 9 (6.12) 15 (10.20) 9 (6.12) 3 (2.04) 48 (26.09) 28 (19.05) Other (432) 6 (1.39) 5 (1.16) 9 (2.08) 1 (0.23) 4 (0.93) 25 (5.79) 51 (11.81)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→