MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108084969 · doi:10.54082/jamsi.2273

Peningkatan Literasi Digital UMKM dan Karang Taruna melalui Pelatihan Canva untuk Penguatan Branding Potensi Lokal di Kalurahan Pleret

2025· article· W7108084969 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital eraEducational organization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformasi digital menjadi kebutuhan mendesak bagi pelaku UMKM dan organisasi kepemudaan untuk meningkatkan daya saing di era ekonomi berbasis teknologi. Kalurahan Pleret, Kapanewon Panjatan, Kabupaten Kulon Progo, memiliki potensi ekonomi lokal yang besar namun masih menghadapi keterbatasan literasi digital, terutama dalam pemanfaatan media daring untuk promosi. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan peserta dalam menggunakan Canva sebagai platform desain grafis daring sekaligus memperkuat strategi pemasaran digital desa. Metode pelaksanaan mencakup sosialisasi, pelatihan praktik, dan pendampingan yang diikuti oleh 20 peserta dari unsur UMKM dan Karang Taruna. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan adanya peningkatan keterampilan desain grafis digital sebesar 42,5% berdasarkan perbandingan skor pre-test dan post-test, serta peningkatan aktivitas promosi daring sebesar 65% melalui media sosial dalam dua bulan pascapelatihan. Kegiatan ini tidak hanya meningkatkan kemampuan teknis peserta, tetapi juga menumbuhkan kesadaran kolektif akan pentingnya branding digital desa. Dengan demikian, program ini berkontribusi nyata terhadap penguatan daya saing UMKM lokal dan memperkuat peran Karang Taruna sebagai penggerak literasi digital di tingkat desa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Abdi Masyarakat IndonesiaSame topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207