MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108213044 · doi:10.4000/159m3

« Pomelo sound system » : une médiation matérielle dans la scène rave underground montréalaise

2025· article· W7108213044 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume ! · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Sound systemSound productionSound pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article part d’une étude de cas d’un sound system implanté dans la scène rave montréalaise, le « pomelo sound system ». Il s’agit de l’explorer comme une médiation matérielle qui sonorise la scène underground rave montréalaise. Cette posture permet d’examiner comment ce sound system façonne les expériences festives, mais surtout révèle des trajectoires culturelles, sociales et économiques qui structurent la scène qu’il sonorise. La singularité du cas étudié permet également d’explorer comment les scènes rave et free québécoises se sont formées distinctement. L’examen montre en effet que bien que le format sound system existe dans la scène free québécoise, celui-ci n’a pas infusé dans la scène rave. De fait, le « pomelo sound system » est le fruit de la trajectoire individuelle de son concepteur, d’un processus d’autonomisation de la scène rave et de la navigation sur des forums en ligne, notamment. Partir du concept de médiation nous permet également de montrer comment ce sound system interagit avec les participant⸱e⸱s d’une fête et se modifie en fonction des événements sonorisés. Il permet également d’explorer la centralité du « pomelo sound system » dans la scène montréalaise et la manière dont il participe de son autonomisation matérielle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume !Same topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207