MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108222338 · doi:10.1017/jpa.2025.10114

Cambrian trilobites and biostratigraphy of the Grand Canyon and vicinity, USA

2025· article· en· W7108222338 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paleontology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanyonTrilobiteBiostratigraphyStage (stratigraphy)Group (periodic table)TaxonLithology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cambrian faunas of the Grand Canyon are neither diverse nor abundant, and several historical collections seem to have mixed taxa from several biozones. As a result, fine-scale reinterpretation of Grand Canyon biostratigraphy and broader-scale correlation of the Tonto Group and its fossils have been hampered by the lack of definitive and refined biostratigraphic indicators. Here we report new fossil occurrences from the Tonto Group, including from units that previously lacked biomineralized fossils, such as the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone. When integrated with historic collections, our data indicate that the Tonto Group ranges from the upper Dyeran to lowermost Steptoean Laurentian stages (global upper Series 2, Stage 4 to basal Furongian Series, Paibian Stage). Trilobite assemblages span the upper Dyeran ( Peachella iddingsi Biozone) to lower Marjuman ( Bolaspidella Biozone) stages and are distributed from the uppermost Tapeats Sandstone to lowermost Frenchman Mountain Dolostone. Based on lithologic and paleontological data, three disconformities occur within the Cambrian of the Grand Canyon: (1) between the Dyeran and Delamaran stages in the uppermost Tapeats to lowermost Bright Angel Formation, (2) within the Delamaran Stage within the Bright Angel Formation, and (3) between the Delamaran and Topazan stages, higher in the Bright Angel Formation. Cambrian trilobites from the Tonto Group consist of seven olenelloid, 17 corynexochid, and 33 ptychoparioid species, as well as 10 taxa that are not identifiable at generic or higher levels. New species include Kootenia barensis and Albertella nebeli. Some taxa are new to the Grand Canyon region, although they are known from the Great Basin (Nevada, California), southern Arizona, Montana, and Canada. These taxa include olenellids: Mesonacis fremonti (Walcott), Olenellus gilberti Meek in White, Olenellus terminatus Palmer, and Olenellus cf. O. fowleri Palmer; corynexochids: Anoria ? bessus (Walcott), Caspimexis cf. C. radiatus (Palmer in Palmer and Halley), Kootenia aff. K. granulospinosa Palmer, 1968, and Zacanthoides cf. Z. typicalis (Walcott); and ptychopariids: Amecephalus cf. Am. normale (Resser), Am. piochensis (Walcott), Am. scapegoatensis (Deiss), Crepicephalus ? upis Walcott, Ehmania weedi Resser, Eldoradia cf. E. prospectensis (Walcott), Glyphaspis tetonensis Resser, Kochina vestita Resser, Mexicella cf. Me. robusta Sundberg and McCollum, Mexicella mexicana Lochman, Modocia sp. indet., Solenopleurella ? quadrata Rasetti, Trachycheilus granulosus Sundberg, and Tr. whirlwindensis Sundberg. Type specimens of Solenopleurella erosa Resser was divided into two species: the pygidia are assigned to Kootenia erosa (Resser) new combination, and the much smaller cranidia are assigned to Spencella ? sp. indet. UUID: http://zoobank.org/f3034b33-00d1-4d00-a9d5-0a73f7a330d2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207