MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7108315049 · doi:10.5286/edata/958

Low-frequency contributions in the radiative efficiencies of HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-43-10mee over the 225 - 298 K temperature range

2025· dataset· en· W7108315049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiative transferAnharmonicitySpectral lineInfraredGlobal-warming potentialOzoneAtmospheric temperature rangeInfrared windowInfrared spectroscopyRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are used as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances regulated under the Montreal Protocol. While having zero ozone depletion potential, HFCs strongly absorb infrared radiation, making them potent greenhouse gases. Vibrational modes associated with C--F stretching absorb strongly within the atmospheric window (750 --1250 cm-1), contributing substantially to radiative forcing. The low-frequency region (< 500 cm-1), which accounts for approximately 16% of the Earth’s thermal emission, has however remained largely unexplored mainly due to instrumental challenges. Here, we present the first experimental measurements of infrared (IR) absorption cross-sections in the 150--500~cm-1 range for HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa, and HFC-43-10mee - three industrially relevant compounds with high global warming potentials (GWPs). The spectra were recorded at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory using a high-resolution Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer in the temperature range between 225 and 298 K at resolution of 0.25 cm-1. In addition, IR cross section spectra were simulated through quantum chemical (QC) calculations including a non-empirical treatment of anharmonic effects. From the experimental results, we derived radiative efficiencies (REs) in the low frequency region of 0.001, 0.005, and 0.003 Wm-2 ppbv-1 for HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa, and HFC-43-10mee, respectively, and revised global warming potentials over 20-, 100-, and 500-year time horizons. Comparison with values reported in the WMO Ozone Assessment Report 2022 reveals minor differences for HFC-245fa and HFC-43-10mee, whereas HFC-236fa shows a significant overestimation, corresponding to a discrepancy of approximately 700 units in the 100-year GWP. On the other hand, our theoretical predictions reproduced the experimental spectra with average deviations below 5%, confirming the reliability of the computational approach even in the low-frequency region. These findings highlight that small variations in the treatment of low-frequency absorptions can propagate into substantial contributions in climate metrics, particularly for long-lived compounds. Overall, this study provides a consistent experimental--theoretical framework for quantifying the radiative forcing of HFCs and reducing current uncertainties in the estimation of their climate-relevant parameters. The dataset comprises: (i) The corresponding raw transmission data of the HFCs measured by the spectrometer, for different sample pressures and temperatures. (ii) The derived experimental absorption cross-section data. The full details are in the associated paper to the data repository.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→