Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Acanthocnema Becker, 1894 Acanthocnema Becker, 1894: 136 (preocc. Costa, 1859). Name conserved by ICZN (1954: 91). Clinoceroides Hendel, 1917: 36. Type species: Cordylura glaucescens Loew, 1864, by original designation. Type species Cordylura nigrimana Zetterstedt, 1846, by original designation. Diagnosis The genus Acanthocnema is characterized by the following combination of characters (modified from Ozerov & Krivosheina 2018): arista short pubescent basally, bare apically; palpus elongate, spatulate, without strong apical / subapical seta; proepisternum with setulae anterior to spiracle; anepisternum covered with setulae along dorsal margin and posteriorly only, without setulae posterior to anterior spiracle; katepisternum with one strong seta in posterodorsal corner; anepimeron bare; postmetacoxal bridge absent; fore femur with or without black spine-like setae ventrally; fore tibia with ventral apical spur, with or without rows of short spinules ventrally; scutellum with a pair of strong apical and a pair of strong basal setae; male sternite 5 usually bilobate posteriorly; ovipositor short and compact, proctiger shifted dorsally bearing long setae; female tergite and sternite 7 fused anteroventrally, tergite 7 subtriangular, strongly tapered and narrowly divided dorsally; female tergite 8 U-shaped, narrowly divided dorsally and encircling proctiger; female sternite 8 divided medially into pair of narrow, tapered lobes. Eggs The egg of A. glaucescens was illustrated by Hinton (1981: pl. 129) with the respiratory ridges or horns surrounding the plastron projecting above the jelly-mass of the host eggs. Larvae The larval instars of A. glaucescens were described and illustrated by Nelson (1992). The final instar is densely covered in setae, with posterior spiracles surrounded by well-developed lateral tubercles. The mouthhooks have dense and pronounced dentation. The prothoracic spiracles are bicornate with 17 papillae. Puparium The puparium was briefly described by Nelson (1992) and photographed by Purcell et al. (2008).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.083 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".