FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN DIGITALIZATION OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes the current problems of the digitalization of public management of higher education. The mentioned relevance of the study is due to the need to increase the efficiency of public management of higher education by implementing modern digital technologies, adapting international experience and responding to the challenges of digital transformation of the educational space. The main goal is to analyze the foreign experience of digitalization of public management of higher education and determine the possibilities of its productive adaptation in Ukraine. The study aims to examine international practices of digitalization of public management of higher education, assessing their effectiveness and developing recommendations for applying best practices in the national education system. The work uses such methods as comparative analysis, content analysis of scientific sources and official documents, case studies of foreign practices of digitalization, as well as a systematic approach to assessing the effectiveness of management processes in higher education. The results of the study demonstrated that foreign practices of digitalization of public management of higher education increase the efficiency of management processes. The article defines concepts, models and key components in the context of higher education. The advantages and challenges of the digitalization of public management of higher education are identified. Foreign experience in digitalization of public management of higher education is studied, in particular, the practices of the EU, the USA, Canada, Japan, South Korea and China. The effectiveness of the use of digital technologies in public management of higher education is substantiated. An assessment of the state of digitalization of public management of higher education in Ukraine is given. The possibilities of adapting foreign experience to Ukrainian realities are identified. Recommendations are developed for adapting the best foreign practices of digitalization to increase the efficiency of public management of higher education in Ukraine. As a result, it was found that digitalization of public management of higher education significantly increases the efficiency of management processes, contributes to the integration of innovative practices and can be successfully adapted to the national education system. Future research should be aimed at developing effective models of digitalization of public management of higher education in Ukraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it