InSAR and GAT-LSTM integration for dam displacement prediction: Lessons from the Oldman River Dam, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The precise prediction of dam deformation is essential for ensuring infrastructure safety and mitigating geohazards, particularly in regions characterized by limited monitoring studies. This research concentrates on the Oldman River Dam in Alberta, Canada, where Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR)-based deformation monitoring and prediction remain inadequately explored. A novel framework that integrates a Graph Attention Network with Long Short-Term Memory (GAT-LSTM) has been developed to address the limitations of existing methods, which neglect spatial dependencies among InSAR-derived points and the increased model complexity stemming from point clustering or InSAR time series decomposition. Sentinel-1 data from three passes were processed utilizing a full-resolution InSAR technique, resulting in semi-vertical deformation velocities that demonstrated consistent subsidence along the dam crest, with rates fluctuating from 5.08 to 6.23 mm/yr. A robust correlation between deformation and reservoir water levels was noted, with accelerated crest deformation during the 2017–2019 drawdown period and a potential risk identified due to a significant decline in water levels projected for 2023–2024. The GAT-LSTM model, which captures both spatial and temporal dynamics, outperformed the standard LSTM, achieving 83.64% accurate points compared to 76.90% for the LSTM in short-term forecasting, exhibiting notable reliability along the crest. The peak performance was observed on September 9, 2021, with a Root Mean Square Error of 0.30 ± 0.013 mm and a Mean Absolute Error of 0.22 ± 0.012 mm. The proposed framework would enhance dam safety monitoring by providing actionable short-term predictions, demonstrating potential transferability to other slow-moving infrastructure. • Developed a GAT-LSTM framework for dam deformation prediction using time series InSAR data. • Demonstrated strong correlation between water level and dam crest subsidence. • GAT–LSTM outperformed the conventional LSTM, achieving a best RMSE of 0.30 mm and MAE of 0.22 mm. • Provides a tool for early warning in dam safety management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".