MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108448071 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104968

InSAR and GAT-LSTM integration for dam displacement prediction: Lessons from the Oldman River Dam, Canada

2025· article· en· W7108448071 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsInterferometric synthetic aperture radarDeformation monitoringDeformation (meteorology)Water levelTime seriesSynthetic aperture radarSeries (stratigraphy)Drawdown (hydrology)Displacement (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The precise prediction of dam deformation is essential for ensuring infrastructure safety and mitigating geohazards, particularly in regions characterized by limited monitoring studies. This research concentrates on the Oldman River Dam in Alberta, Canada, where Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR)-based deformation monitoring and prediction remain inadequately explored. A novel framework that integrates a Graph Attention Network with Long Short-Term Memory (GAT-LSTM) has been developed to address the limitations of existing methods, which neglect spatial dependencies among InSAR-derived points and the increased model complexity stemming from point clustering or InSAR time series decomposition. Sentinel-1 data from three passes were processed utilizing a full-resolution InSAR technique, resulting in semi-vertical deformation velocities that demonstrated consistent subsidence along the dam crest, with rates fluctuating from 5.08 to 6.23 mm/yr. A robust correlation between deformation and reservoir water levels was noted, with accelerated crest deformation during the 2017–2019 drawdown period and a potential risk identified due to a significant decline in water levels projected for 2023–2024. The GAT-LSTM model, which captures both spatial and temporal dynamics, outperformed the standard LSTM, achieving 83.64% accurate points compared to 76.90% for the LSTM in short-term forecasting, exhibiting notable reliability along the crest. The peak performance was observed on September 9, 2021, with a Root Mean Square Error of 0.30 ± 0.013 mm and a Mean Absolute Error of 0.22 ± 0.012 mm. The proposed framework would enhance dam safety monitoring by providing actionable short-term predictions, demonstrating potential transferability to other slow-moving infrastructure. • Developed a GAT-LSTM framework for dam deformation prediction using time series InSAR data. • Demonstrated strong correlation between water level and dam crest subsidence. • GAT–LSTM outperformed the conventional LSTM, achieving a best RMSE of 0.30 mm and MAE of 0.22 mm. • Provides a tool for early warning in dam safety management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207