MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108462847 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2025.10.004

Synthesis, Characterization, and Computational Investigation of 2,5-Bis(2-Methyl-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole: Quantum Chemical Analysis, ADME Prediction, Molecular Docking, and MD-Based Corrosion Study for Photonic and Therapeutic Applications

2025· article· W7108462847 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité Chouaib Doukkali
KeywordsADMEMolecular dynamicsThermal stabilityDensity functional theoryPhotonicsAdsorptionDocking (animal)Chemical stabilityMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the synthesis and characterization of 2,5-bis(2-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole, using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectrometry and FTIR-ATR infrared spectroscopy. Quantum chemical analysis revealed that P1 possesses a balanced electrophilic–nucleophilic profile, enabling interactions with diverse biological targets. Its HOMO–LUMO gap and electronic stability suggest potential applications in photonic devices. ADMET predictions indicated favorable pharmacokinetics and overall drug-likeness. Molecular docking demonstrated high binding affinities toward anticancer, antibacterial, and antifungal proteins, with P1 reproducing reference ligand binding modes while forming additional stabilizing contacts. Molecular Dynamics simulations captured the thermal motion and conformational flexibility of P1 on the Fe(110) surface, while Monte Carlo simulations identified energy-minimized, compact adsorption conformations. Both approaches confirmed thermodynamically favorable chemisorption, stabilized by direct surface interactions and solvent/ionic contributions. Together, these findings highlight P1 as a dual-purpose scaffold, combining selective biological activity, favorable electronic properties, and strong surface interactions. This integrated computational study supports its potential for both therapeutic development and optoelectronic application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicMicrobial Applications in Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207