MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108476635 · doi:10.2196/75094

Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Using Sequential Analysis in Korea: Population-Based Retrospective Observational Study

2025· article· en· W7108476635 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyVaccine safetyRetrospective cohort studyMEDLINEVaccinationPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With the advent of new vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines introduced during the recent pandemic, the need for near real-time active surveillance has increased to support timely regulatory decision-making. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of sequential monitoring for potential adverse events following immunization in Korea, focusing on COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: This population-based study used a linked database that combined the COVID-19 registry with national health insurance claims data. Participants included individuals older than 12 years who received either monovalent or bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in Korea between February 2021 and March 2023. Monthly retrospective sequential testing was performed for 3 prespecified outcomes (acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and anaphylaxis) as well as a negative control event (colonic diverticulitis). A Poisson-based maximized sequential probability ratio test was applied to compare postvaccination incidence rates with historical background rates, accounting for multiple testing and claims processing delays. Analyses were stratified by age group, vaccine platform, and dose. Results: This study included over 43 million monovalent and 6.3 million bivalent vaccine recipients. Sequential analyses identified statistical signals for myocarditis following mRNA vaccines in individuals aged 12 to 64 years and protein subunit vaccines in those aged 40 to 64 years. Signals for anaphylaxis were observed following mRNA and nonreplicating viral vector vaccines in individuals older than 18 years. No safety signals were identified for acute myocardial infarction or colonic diverticulitis. Sequential monitoring detected signals for myocarditis and anaphylaxis before regulatory authorities took safety actions, with the earliest signals observed on September 30, 2021, and April 30, 2021, respectively. Conclusions: Near real-time sequential testing detected statistical safety signals for myocarditis and anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination. These signals were recognized by the regulatory authority as being associated with the vaccines, demonstrating the potential of this approach to detect signals requiring further causality assessments, particularly for newly introduced vaccines at an early stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsFrench-language works237,207