MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108719587 · doi:10.5284/1138728

Archaeological Buildings Recording, Kangaroo Works, Wellington Street, Sheffield

2011· article· en· W7108719587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionSituatedQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)CarvingCliffSettlement (finance)Architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report describes a programme of archaeological building recording of the former Kangaroo Works, Wellington Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire. The work was commissioned by Hammerson UK Properties plc in advance of the Sevenstone development, formally known as the New Retail Quarter (NRQ). Fieldwork was undertaken by ARCUS in October 2007. Final report edits have been completed by Wessex Archaeology on behalf of The University of Sheffield. Previous archaeological work undertaken regarding the site includes an archaeological desk-based assessment of land and buildings within the proposed New Retail Quarter, a detailed archive assessment for the proposed New Retail Quarter, and a historic building assessment. The Kangaroo Works was constructed between c.1895-1896 as an extension to the adjacent larger works complex of the Trafalgar Grinding Wheel. The works replaced a former reservoir and originally housed a forge on the ground floor with warehouse space situated on the floors above. The works was built and owned by R. Sorby and Sons who were a renowned manufacturer of edge tools. The building had remained largely unaltered since its construction, despite the demolition of the attached Trafalgar Grinding Wheel in the 1980s and the numerous occupants of the building since 1967. However, the forge on the ground floor had been removed with little evidence retained at the time of survey. Kangaroo Works was unusual in architectural style for the period, whilst the positioning of a forge within a principal range was also rare. However, aspects of the layout of the building were conventional, such as the positioning of the cart passage, an enclosed rear yard and generous fenestration throughout. The structure was part steel framed and had cast iron columns/flues on the ground floor which not only functioned structurally but also as flues for the forge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207