A Study on Enhancing Employee Performance by Implying Data Science and Digitalization: The Moderating Role of HR Function in Digital Era
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has become increasing standpoints in the digital era for organizations to focus on protecting sensitive employee information. In fact, all organizations today have used AI in all functional areas so that work efficiency is increased among employees in the organization. The role of AI is continuing all functions of HR from recruitment to performance appraisal. This research investigates how digitalization and data science work for improving employee performance in this transformation. The research included a survey to 313 respondents from different professionals who well understood the topic being examined on how such digital tools and data-driven strategies impact production and performance such as, IT, HRM and Administrative executives. Data from the survey were analyzed using SPSS 20, which further allowed a deeper exploration of other critical aspects, including adoption of digital tools, making decisions through data, and employee engagement. The results imply that data science and digital technologies fairly means superior employee performance, as they improve efficiency, enhance decision making, and this leads to more engaged and informed workforce. However, the study has emphasized the way of transforming the workplace through digitalization and made useful recommendations to organizations willing to employ data science for performance benefits. Most importantly, it states the essence of investing in digital tools and data literacy to be competitive in this age of digitization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it