MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108732696 · doi:10.5284/1138750

Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of the former Pearl Works, 17-21 Eyre Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire

2006· article· en· W7108732696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedevelopmentClearanceSettlement (finance)PearlQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)FrontierHistoric siteUrbanization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In December 2006, ARCUS were commissioned by BDP on behalf of their client to undertake a desk-based assessment of the former Pearl Works, 17-21 Eyre Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire (SK 3537 8676). The assessment was required in relation to a planning application for the redevelopment of the site, which lies within the Cultural Industries Quarter Conservation Area, and comprised a site visit, along with documentary and cartographic research. During the medieval period, the proposal area appears to have been part of the deer park maintained by the manorial lords of Sheffield and is thus unlikely to have been the focus of settlement during this period. The site was located within Alsop Fields during the post-medieval period and remained largely undeveloped pasture in 1771, although part of the grounds of a detached structure may have been within the site boundary at that date. Urbanisation occurred throughout the immediate area during the late 18th century and the site was fully developed by 1808. The nature of this initial phase remains unclear, and while it is possible that domestic structures were part of the early 19th-century development, industrial buildings appeared to occupy the plot by 1853. In 1890, the site had been redeveloped further and had been absorbed into the Arundel Works cutlery factory. By 1923, the late 19th-century buildings had replaced by the Pearl Works. The latter appear to represent a single phase of construction, suggesting that the site had been cleared of standing buildings prior to this redevelopment. A basement level is visible at the rear of the Pearl Works and it is possible that 19th-century archaeological deposits will have been impacted substantially by the construction of the later works. However, this issue cannot be determined on the basis of the current evidence. Further archaeological evaluation would be required to establish the extent and condition of any surviving 19th-century archaeological deposits. A 1999 survey conducted by the Royal Commission for the Historic Monuments of England concluded that the Pearl Works were a good example of an early 20 th- century cutlery factory within Sheffield. However, the standing buildings are currently in a poor condition and do not appear to be of key archaeological, historical or architectural significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207