MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7109091448 · doi:10.14288/1.0450939

Parent-child health behaviour patterns and adolescent weight : the moderating role of parenting styles

2025· article· en· W7109091448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationParenting stylesTest (biology)Sedentary behaviorAdolescent healthExploratory researchLatent class modelStyle (visual arts)Obesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adolescent obesity is associated with multiple health behaviours within the family context, including diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Parenting styles may influence these behaviours, yet the combined effects of parent-child behavioural patterns and parenting styles on adolescent weight outcomes remain understudied. Objective: To examine how mother-child patterns of diet, physical activity, screen time, and sleep behaviours are associated with adolescent zBMI, including the moderating role of parenting styles. Methods: Data from 478 Grade 7 adolescents and their parents were collected for the HABITs study (P.I. Dr. LC Mâsse) in Vancouver, British Columbia between 2019 and 2021. Participants completed questionnaires about their health behaviours and adolescents reported on parental demandingness and responsiveness. Latent class analysis was used to extract patterns of behaviours. Multilinear regressions were used to model the relationship between behaviour patterns and zBMI, and interaction terms were included to test for moderation effects. Exploratory analyses on adolescent-only behaviour patterns were used to supplement the primary analyses. Results: Neither mother-child nor adolescent-only behavioural patterns were significantly associated with zBMI. However, a meaningful three-way interaction (p < 0.20) emerged for adolescent-only behavioural groups between the healthiest group and the active + high screen group. Adolescents in the active + high screen group had a zBMI on average 2.00 units higher than the healthiest group under neglectful parenting (low responsiveness and low demandingness; p =0.12) and 0.91 units higher under authoritative parenting (high demandingness × high responsiveness; p = 0.17). Though not statistically significant, these interactions suggest that parenting style may moderate how adolescent behaviours impact weight, potentially shifting weight classification from healthy to overweight or obese. Conclusions: Findings indicate that parenting style may moderate the association between adolescent behaviours and weight. Future research with larger and diverse samples is needed to further examine these relationships. Understanding the interplay between family behaviour patterns and parenting styles could inform tailored interventions to support healthier weight trajectories in adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→