Giant Nickel Mine : how communities and industry can work together to develop and execute sustainable outcomes for all
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Giant Nickel Mine, located near the community of Hope in southern British Columbia, Canada is a former underground mine which produced a significant amount of nickel and copper from the 1930s until operations ceased in 1974. During operations, approximately 2 million cubic meters of tailings were deposited in two tailings storage facilities (TSFs), collectively referred to as the Giant Nickel TSF. Barrick took over management of the legacy Giant Nickel site in 2001 with the acquisition of Homestake Mining Company. At that time, physical reclamation of Giant Nickel was largely complete, and the site was in a state of ‘passive closure’ with no active management required. In keeping with Barrick’s commitment to responsible tailings management and sustainable mine closure, a project was initiated in 2016 to better understand and improve the long-term geotechnical and environmental performance of the Giant Nickel TSF. A key objective of the project was to integrate stakeholder needs and concerns into project design and execution. The project was executed by local contractors and provided meaningful work to residents and economic input into the community over a two-year period. Barrick also worked collaboratively with stakeholders to provide safe access to the motocross trail network and campground adjacent to the TSF. This project demonstrates the benefits of collaborating with communities, First Nations, and other stakeholders to develop holistic mine closure plans that provide long-term value post-closure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.043 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".