MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7109944836 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17845154

CMIP7 ScenarioMIP historical timeseries for harmonisation and simple climate model workflow

2025· dataset· W7109944836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasWorkflowClimate modelClimate changeProcess (computing)Set (abstract data type)Simple (philosophy)Global warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

History for CMIP7 ScenarioMIP emissions harmonisation The files here are compiled historical experiment timeseries. They were compiled for use as part of the CMIP7 ScenarioMIP exercise and are primarily used for supporting emissions harmonisation. Here, 'harmonisation' means alignment of modelled emissions from IAMs with the emissions used for the CMIP7 historical experiment. As a result, they are a key input for the process of 'gridding' emissions (i.e. taking raw emissions from IAMs and assigning them to a spatial grid, ready for use by Earth System Models (ESMs)) and for running the simple climate model based assessment of the scenarios to derive a first-order estimate of the warming associated with these scenarios (the ESMs will quantify the warming and other climate change associated with these scenarios as part of ScenarioMIP, and this quantification is underpinned by a deeper, more physically-based set of modelling assumptions.) There are three different files, provided in three different formats each. The three files are: gridding-history*: the history used for harmonisation at the 'gridding' level. The gridding requires emissions with regional and sectoral detail. It also has to support every IAMs' native regions. As a result, there are lots (of order 30 000) timeseries. country-history*: same as above, but at the country level rather than in native IAM regions. global-workflow-history*: the history used for harmonisation at the 'global' level. This only has global total emissions, except for CO2 which is split into fossil-based and land-based (i.e. originating from the land carbon pool) emissions. It includes a number of species that are not used in the gridding workflow but are relevant for climate projections e.g. all of the greenhouse gases covered by the Montreal Protocol. As a result, there are only 52 timeseries. The files were derived using the code in this repository: https://github.com/iiasa/emissions_harmonization_historical. The filenames are composed of identifiers related to the processing of each of the different input data sources. To identify the exact meaning of these identifiers, please see the processing code in https://github.com/iiasa/emissions_harmonization_historical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it