CANADIAN - LATIN AMERICAN RELATIONS: FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT IN 1968-1993
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the Latin American policy of Canada during the premierships of Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney. It should be noted that the foreign policy of the Canadian Prime Ministers was aimed at improving Canada’s geopolitical image in the Latin American region, as well as establishing mutually beneficial economic ties with its member states. It is significant to underline, that, despite their internal party diversities and different party manifestos, both Canadian Conservatives and Liberals were united in their desire to develop foreign policy ties with the Latin American countries in 1968–1993. The article emphasizes that, if in the years of Pierre Trudeau’s premiership the foundation was laid for the future of a sustainable trade, economic and political interaction between Canada and the Latin American countries, then during Brian Mulroney’s tenure Canada joined the Organization of American States. The author believes that the Latin American policy of Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney was significant for strengthening Canada’s cooperation with the Latin American countries. Such a policy contributed to Canada’s further success in this area. The author of the article concludes that Pierre Trudeau’s and Brian Mulroney’s different attitudes towards their country’s foreign policy issues did not prevent them from fruitfully developing the relations with the Latin American countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".