Dissolved organic carbon enhances terrestrial carbon pathways with limited effects on freshwater fish trophic position
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are affected by fluctuations in terrestrially derived dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Increased DOC runoff from watersheds can contribute to the "browning" of freshwater systems, altering water properties and disrupting food web dynamics, with potential impacts on fish. This study examined how carbon sources and the trophic ecology of temperate freshwater fishes varied with DOC concentrations. We used stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ¹³C) and nitrogen (δ¹⁵N) to trace carbon sources in organisms at low trophic levels and to assess the trophic ecology of six fish species from 70 lakes in Sweden, Germany, Canada, and the United States. We found that both pelagic and benthic δ¹³C decreased as DOC increased, suggesting higher reliance on terrestrial carbon by lower trophic level organisms. Fish responses to elevated DOC were limited to certain species. Mid-trophic level European perch (Perca fluviatilis) increased pelagic diet proportions, while top predators like northern pike (Esox Lucius) and walleye (Sander vitreus) showed non-linear shifts. Except for walleye, no effect of DOC was detected on fish trophic position. Our findings suggest that DOC alters energy use and diet but not trophic position in some freshwater fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it