MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7110226906 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.04.25341613

Proliferation- and cytotoxic immune signatures identify chemotherapy-responsive bladder tumors in a molecular subtype dependent manner

2025· article· W7110226906 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCancerfondenEuropean Commission
KeywordsBladder cancerCohortTranscriptomeCystectomyGene expression profilingCytotoxic T cellGeneImmune systemBiomarker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) has been the standard care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) for two decades. One third of NAC-treated patients achieve pathologic complete response (pT0N0), a proxy for improved survival after RC. Predicting response already at transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) would enable selective use of NAC, minimizing unnecessary toxicity and exposure to ineffective therapy. We aimed to identify tumor mRNAs predicting response across multiple transcriptomic studies, prioritizing subsequent biomarkers for validation. Three NAC-treated and one RC-only cohort with tumor transcriptomic profiles were included. Differential mRNA-expression analysis and subtype classification according to the Lund Taxonomy were performed. Within each cohort and molecular subtype, genes were ranked by differential expression, and ranks were integrated across cohorts into a meta rank-score. Its predictive value for treatment response was assessed by resampling. Survival associations of top genes in the NAC- and RC-only cohorts were compared to select candidate biomarkers for protein level validation. Proliferation/late cell-cycle gene expression predicted NAC response within the Urothelial-like subtype and expression of cytotoxic T- and NK-cell-related genes predicted response in Basal/Squamous tumors. These findings were validated by immunostainings for CCNB1 and NKG7, respectively. This integrative framework suggests a complex picture in which two main NAC-predictive signals, the proliferation and the T/NK-cell signatures, identify responders in a subtype dependent manner. Meta rank-scores additionally suggest new candidate biomarkers in each Lund Taxonomy subtype. The applied framework can be updated as new datasets become available, providing dynamic exploration of NAC-predictive biomarkers in MIBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→