Exploring tree species classification from UAV orthophotos using foundation models and transfer learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring tree species at fine spatial resolutions is essential for biodiversity assessment, ecological research, and forest management. The growing availability of open access UAV datasets has facilitated the development of deep learning methods for fine-grained forest monitoring, particularly in tasks such as tree crown detection and species classification. In recent years, AIdriven approaches, including deep learning models, have been increasingly used for tree species classification, though challenges remain, such as high intra class variability, spectral similarity among species, limited annotated data, and complex canopy structures. Numerous studies have leveraged machine learning techniques for AI based tree species classification, but many models still face limitations in generalization across different forest types and environmental conditions. The Quebec Trees Dataset has become a valuable benchmark for tree species classification, providing a high resolution, UAV-based orthomosaic dataset from temperate forests. It comprises 21 UAV derived orthomosaics acquired in 2021 during different phenological stages, with a ground sampling distance of approximately 2 cm. More than 23,000 manually annotated tree crowns are included across 14 species or genera. Each orthomosaic was generated using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry and supported by accurate field-collected reference data. Despite its high annotation quality and temporal richness, recent studies using this dataset have reported moderate classification accuracies, particularly for rare species, indicating room for improvement in model robustness and generalization. To address these challenges, we explore the use of foundation models large pretrained neural networks originally developed for general computer vision tasks and apply transfer learning to the UAV based tree species classification task. By fine tuning these models on the Quebec Trees Dataset, we aim to improve classification accuracy, particularly under conditions of class imbalance and complex canopy structures. In this study, we implement a UNet architecture with a ResNet50 encoder, comparing models trained from scratch to those initialized with pretrained weights. Preliminary results indicate that while the overall improvement remains limited, pretrained models offer more stable training behavior and perform better on underrepresented species. This work contributes to the advancement of AI-based ecological monitoring using UAV data and highlights the potential of foundation models for improving tree species classification. We also provide a perspective on the evolving research landscape surrounding the Quebec Trees Dataset and its growing use in remote sensing and forest informatics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".