MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110562991

Validation of Parallel WRF Downscaling Methodology using OpenFOAM

2017· article· W7110562991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeather Research and Forecasting ModelMesoscale meteorologySolverNumerical weather predictionComputational fluid dynamicsDownscalingPlanetary boundary layerDomain decomposition methods
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this study is to obtain real-time atmospheric flow solutions using open source CFD solver OpenFOAM coupled with Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model; Weather Research Forecast (WRF). NWP can take moist convection, land surface parameterization, atmospheric boundary layer physics into account, but wind flow features finer than 1 km aren't captured by the turbulence physics of such models. CFD simulations, however, have proved to be useful at capturing the details of smaller scales due to a finer scale topography. Moreover, using the WRF weather prediction data as unsteady and spatially varying BCs for the CFD solution may prove to be one of the most realistic representations for the atmospheric flow field, and also allows daily power production estimations. Coupling the mesoscale weather prediction model WRF (Weather Research and Forecast) with the open source CFD solver OpenFOAM is done via using low resolution WRF data as unsteady and spatially varying boundary conditions for the OpenFOAM domain.For this purpose, a new unsteady and spatially varying boundary condition class (timeVaryingMixed) that switches between Neumann and Dirichlet depending on the flow is entering or exiting the domain to use the WRF data as boundary conditions without convergence issues for continuity, is developed.Due to real-time prediction requirement, parallelization of the process is of utmost importance. But the developed boundary condition class 'timeVaryingMixed' cannot be run in parallel using OpenFOAM's domain decomposition tool decomposePar as the indexes of cells change when the domainis decomposed. Parallelization of the process is done and made automatic using METIS to optimize the number of partitionboundaries, even when all the cells that arein neighbourhoodof the developed boundary condition timeVaryingMixed, are owned by 1 processor. Details about the methodology and parallelization of process will be given in the final paper.Unsteady OpenFOAM solutions coupled with WRF are performed using the methodology on high resolution stretching structured grids seen in Figure 2. High resolution (1.5 arcsec) ASTER GDEM topographical data is used to create the topography in order to capture the viscous effects which dominates the flow characteristics at the surface layer of the atmosphere where majority of the wind turbines reside. Simulations in Alaiz Mountain (Spain) are carried out and validation studies using the met-mast data from the region are done at the met-mast location at 5 different heights(118, 102, 90, 78, 40 meters) above the ground. As a preliminary result, time-series wind speed data at118and 40meters above ground is given in Figure 1.Results show a drastic improvement over the WRF results especially in thevicinity of the ground.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.046 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it