MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110588529

MİRAS-EKSENLİ KENTSEL DÖNÜŞÜM PROJELERİNİN ANTAKYA TARİHİ KENT MERKEZİNE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

2022· dissertation· W7110588529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban regenerationPanacea (medicine)Cultural heritageUrban planningRegeneration (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Promotion (chess)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The worldwide phenomenon of heritage-led regeneration has been considered a panacea for dilapidated historic urban tissues to regenerate them through their cultural heritage. However, the promotion of the heritage through development plans and projects affects the physical and social aspects of historic urban tissues substantially. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the precise impacts of heritage-led regeneration due to its extensive effects on historic cities and residents. Antakya, or ancient Antioch, as a historic city has been experiencing the same process in recent decades. Since the beginning of the implementation of Antakya’s conservation development plan in 1987, the historic core of the city has undergone changes in its physical, functional, and social features. In 2009 after the revision of the conservation development plan, this process accelerated. While some of these changes can be beneficial for the city, they also cause problems like extensive interventions to historic buildings, the loss of the resident’s collective memory and spirit of the place, and the displacement of the inhabitants. At present, the Zenginler Quarter, a quarter near the historic urban core, has experienced severe transformation and there are not many studies on the impacts of heritage-led regeneration on Antakya’s tissue and residents. This thesis aims to assess the impacts of heritage-led urban regeneration projects on the historic Zenginler Quarter in Antakya. The impacts are evaluated first by defining the parameters related to Antakya’s physical, functional, social, and cultural features. Secondly, the changes in relation to these parameters are studied and analyzed. Based on the analysis of these changes, the evaluations are done in terms of physical, functional, and social aspects of the quarter. Accordingly, the impacts of heritage-led regeneration projects are assessed. This assessment enables us to present general suggestions to monitor and manage heritage-led regeneration’s impact on Antakya’s urban tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207