MİRAS-EKSENLİ KENTSEL DÖNÜŞÜM PROJELERİNİN ANTAKYA TARİHİ KENT MERKEZİNE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The worldwide phenomenon of heritage-led regeneration has been considered a panacea for dilapidated historic urban tissues to regenerate them through their cultural heritage. However, the promotion of the heritage through development plans and projects affects the physical and social aspects of historic urban tissues substantially. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the precise impacts of heritage-led regeneration due to its extensive effects on historic cities and residents. Antakya, or ancient Antioch, as a historic city has been experiencing the same process in recent decades. Since the beginning of the implementation of Antakya’s conservation development plan in 1987, the historic core of the city has undergone changes in its physical, functional, and social features. In 2009 after the revision of the conservation development plan, this process accelerated. While some of these changes can be beneficial for the city, they also cause problems like extensive interventions to historic buildings, the loss of the resident’s collective memory and spirit of the place, and the displacement of the inhabitants. At present, the Zenginler Quarter, a quarter near the historic urban core, has experienced severe transformation and there are not many studies on the impacts of heritage-led regeneration on Antakya’s tissue and residents. This thesis aims to assess the impacts of heritage-led urban regeneration projects on the historic Zenginler Quarter in Antakya. The impacts are evaluated first by defining the parameters related to Antakya’s physical, functional, social, and cultural features. Secondly, the changes in relation to these parameters are studied and analyzed. Based on the analysis of these changes, the evaluations are done in terms of physical, functional, and social aspects of the quarter. Accordingly, the impacts of heritage-led regeneration projects are assessed. This assessment enables us to present general suggestions to monitor and manage heritage-led regeneration’s impact on Antakya’s urban tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".