MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110666612

Wholehearted Leadership: Equipping Clergy for Healthy Leadership

2025· article· W7110666612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - George Fox University (George Fox University) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommitNoticeChristian ministryIdentity (music)ForgivenessCurriculumCovenantNarrativeApostle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NPO Statement: Considering current training for Evangelical clergy, sustained attention to spiritual formation is often missing but essential for pastoral health and healthy, sustainable ministry. Clergy are burning out significantly, as reported by a Lifeway Research Poll that found 100% of 1,500 pastors know colleagues that left the ministry, while 91% of pastors report experiencing burnout.1 The research suggests that seminary does not prepare clergy for the demands of ministry or the practical spiritual needs of their congregations. Clergy struggle to maintain a solid vocational identity rooted in the Trinity amid pastoral duties. Many clergy are isolated from ongoing support and identify the need for sustained formational communities of belonging. They believe understanding their story is critical to healthy ministry. I am ordained in the Evangelical Covenant Church (ECC). The ECC has eleven conferences across the United States and Canada, each led by conference staff. I will utilize my pastoral experience and connections with conference leaders to enlist clergy participation in the ECC and broader Evangelical context. The MVP/Doctoral Project consists of a two-year curriculum delivered in four webinar/retreat sequences spaced six months apart. This project will incorporate “Three Strand Strong” (3S) groups, consisting of two or three participants from the larger cohort. 3S Groups will commit to staying together for at least five years. There are pre-reading and content-rich webinars. Participants will engage in autobiographical storytelling at experientially and relationally focused retreats. This sequence allows belonging to emerge over multiple touchpoints while allowing participants time to notice how their stories impact their emotional maturity, relationships, and formation in Christ. The Sequence timeline: Webinar 3S Groups meet once in between webinar and retreat Retreat, one month after webinar 3S Groups meet once per month until next webinar Repeat the timeline for the remainder of cohort 1 Bill Gaultiere, "Pastors Under Stress," accessed February 3, 2025, https://www.soulshepherding.org/pastors-under-stress/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it