MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110814868 · doi:10.18739/a2833n13k

Wetland plant functional trait responses to experimental warming and flooding, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (Western Alaska, USA) (2022-2023)

2025· dataset· en· W7110814868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenologyDeltaCarexWetlandDeciduousFlooding (psychology)TraitClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset was created to understand plant trait responses to warming and flooding in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K) Delta (western Alaska, USA). We conducted a two-year field experiment in which we passively increased temperatures, simulated periodic tidal flooding at two intensity levels (low and high) during the 2022 and 2023 summer growing season. Our treatments reflect changes expected in the Y-K Delta in the next 10-20 years. We conducted the experiment in a wet sedge-shrub meadow and only sampled the dominant species in this community. At the end of the 2023 season, we measured economics traits (specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, specific stem density) and size-related traits (height, leaf area, leaf thickness) in four focal species: the dominant sedge Carex rariflora, the dominant deciduous dwarf-shrub Salix fuscescens, the most abundant grass, Calamagrostis canadensis, and the most abundant forb, Potentilla palustris. We also measured additional traits related to seasonal growth, reproduction, and reproductive phenology to capture species temporal responses to warming and flooding in the two most dominant species. These included vegetative height over time, number of reproductive structures, reproductive structure length, reproductive shoot height (Carex only), and reproductive phenological stages (Salix only).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibraryFrench-language works237,207