MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1119 Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Irregular Bowel Patterns During Menstrual Cycle of Patients With Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies

2025· article· en· W7111024509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenstruationConstipationOdds ratioMenstrual cycleIrritable bowel syndromeCochrane LibraryMeta-analysisPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Dysmenorrhea, defined as painful menstruation, affects up to 90% of menstruating women and often presents with concurrent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms such as bloating, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping. While these symptoms are frequently self-reported, the overlap between dysmenorrhea and bowel irregularities remains underexplored. Fluctuations in progesterone, estrogen, and elevated prostaglandin levels during menstruation may contribute to altered GI motility. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence and types of GI dysfunction among patients with dysmenorrhea and evaluate the strength of this association using population data. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through from 2010 to 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control designs that evaluated GI symptoms or bowel pattern changes during menstruation in individuals with dysmenorrhea. A total of 6 studies comprising 450 participants were included. A large majority of the studies conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: The pooled analysis showed a significantly higher prevalence of diarrhea, and constipation in women with dysmenorrhea compared to those without. The subgroup analyses suggested a stronger association among women less than 30 years of age and in those not using hormonal contraceptives. Across all of the studies the average odds ratio was between 1 and 4 indicating that the risk factor for GI dysfunction is higher in women with dysmenorrhea and those who are not on oral contraceptives. Conclusion: GI dysfunction is significantly more prevalent in individuals with dysmenorrhea, supporting the hypothesis of a shared pathophysiological mechanism that involves fluctuations in progesterone, estrogen, and prostaglandin-mediated smooth muscle activity. Recognition of these comorbid symptoms can guide comprehensive clinical management and improve quality of life. Future research should focus on mechanistic and longitudinal studies to delineate causality and therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.035
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207