S1119 Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Irregular Bowel Patterns During Menstrual Cycle of Patients With Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Dysmenorrhea, defined as painful menstruation, affects up to 90% of menstruating women and often presents with concurrent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms such as bloating, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping. While these symptoms are frequently self-reported, the overlap between dysmenorrhea and bowel irregularities remains underexplored. Fluctuations in progesterone, estrogen, and elevated prostaglandin levels during menstruation may contribute to altered GI motility. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence and types of GI dysfunction among patients with dysmenorrhea and evaluate the strength of this association using population data. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through from 2010 to 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control designs that evaluated GI symptoms or bowel pattern changes during menstruation in individuals with dysmenorrhea. A total of 6 studies comprising 450 participants were included. A large majority of the studies conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: The pooled analysis showed a significantly higher prevalence of diarrhea, and constipation in women with dysmenorrhea compared to those without. The subgroup analyses suggested a stronger association among women less than 30 years of age and in those not using hormonal contraceptives. Across all of the studies the average odds ratio was between 1 and 4 indicating that the risk factor for GI dysfunction is higher in women with dysmenorrhea and those who are not on oral contraceptives. Conclusion: GI dysfunction is significantly more prevalent in individuals with dysmenorrhea, supporting the hypothesis of a shared pathophysiological mechanism that involves fluctuations in progesterone, estrogen, and prostaglandin-mediated smooth muscle activity. Recognition of these comorbid symptoms can guide comprehensive clinical management and improve quality of life. Future research should focus on mechanistic and longitudinal studies to delineate causality and therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".