Il San Francesco a Cascia. Storia e restauri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first news about the church of San Francesco in Cascia dates back to 1247, the year in which the Convent of the Minors was transferred within the urban area. The new location of the convent complex, at the south-west edge of the city walls and near one of the city gates, contributed to the economic and social development and organization of the surrounding urban space. The façade of the church forms the backdrop to a very elongated trapezoidal square that has on its axis, in the opposite direction, at the end of a narrow village, the collegiate church of S. Maria, incorporated within the urban structure following the expansion towards the valley, in a north-west direction, of the circuit of the walls. The building is the result of the transformation begun during the last quarter of the fourteenth century and concluded in the first twenty years of the following century, probably also induced to repair the damage caused by the earthquake of 1338 on the original thirteenth-century structure. The architectural organism still retains its spatial unity substantially intact, despite having been the subject, in various eras, of ‘modernizations’, structural interventions (especially after the violent earthquakes of 1599 and 1703) and restorations. The demolition of the convent, which insisted on the right side of the church, which occurred during the thirties of the last century for the opening of the new road axis, determined an almost total estrangement of the ecclesiastical building from the current urban context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.212 | 0.074 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".