MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111323524 · doi:10.17632/dttrnys23t.1

Brazilin-Loaded Biodegradable Electrospun Membranes with Tunable Release for Active and Intelligent Food Packaging - Litke et al. (2026)

2025· dataset· W7111323524 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood packagingActive packagingElectrospinningMembraneFood spoilageFabricationChitosan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document contains the experimental data generated during the preparation of the manuscript "Brazilin-Loaded Biodegradable Electrospun Membranes with Tunable Release for Active and Intelligent Food Packaging". This study reports the fabrication and characterization of electrospun poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) membranes incorporating brazilin, a natural polyphenolic compound with antioxidant, antimicrobial, and pH-responsive dye properties. Monoaxial and coaxial electrospinning were employed to tailor fiber morphology and release kinetics, enabling modulation from rapid to sustained diffusion. The dataset documents the analysis of the fibers via SEM and fluorescent microscopy, the analysis of the swelling and release behaviour of the fibers, the antioxidant activity (ABTS and FRAP), the antibacterial behavior, as well as the colourimetric response to changes in pH. Collectively, these findings establish brazilin-loaded electrospun membranes as multifunctional, biodegradable packaging materials that integrate active protection with intelligent sensing. By uniting sustained antioxidant activity, targeted antimicrobial efficacy, and visible spoilage indication, this work advances the development of next-generation packaging technologies that enhance food quality, safety, and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0080.008
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207